![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TTORA Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. ATTENTION: In an on-going effort to keep this forum spam free, the Forum Admin approves every new account before giving any posting rights to new users. Accounts are normally approved within 24 hours. Sorry for any inconvenience, but verification of every new account is what will continue to keep this forum spam free. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 678
|
I just regeared my truck and have almost the exact same MPG as before the regear. I couldn't do both the front and the rear at the same time, so I just did the rear for now. So, before the regear, I was running higher RPM's, with the speedo showing about 5 MPH slower than actual speed at 70 MPH. Now, it feels peppier, I am looking at lower RPM's, and about 75 on speedo when doing 70 MPH. Before rear regear I was getting about 14 MPG, and I'm still about the same. I regeared from 4.10's (yes, I checked the gear code on my door jam), to 4.56's. Anyone have any suggestions? I thought that a regear was supposed to help with the MPG. Shouldn't a v6, on 33's perform better with 4.56's than 4.10's? And shouldn't it make no difference what the front is at as the drive shaft drives the rear gears and rear wheels in 2wd? Thanks!
__________________
"In the time it took you to come up with a witty flame, you could have just answered the freaking question!" Ugly 1985 4Runner |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
My Rig: 1985 Pickup
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 3,375
|
If the speedo is off then there is a chance that the odometer is off too and it could be misrepresenting how far you actually drove. Don't reall know just a thought
__________________
~ Todd 85 ex. cab 1 tons, coilovers, ect 01 Dodge Ram 2500 w/ a Cummins.....Tow rig |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
__________________
Its all fun and games till someone loses and eye.... Then its just a game, find the eye!!! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
~Miguel
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,160
|
Quote:
This being said, if you adjust in the error factor for the amount your speedo is off then that should get you back close to your ACTUAL mpg, the figure you get when you divide the milage by gallons used is off because of this amount not being factored into the equation. Unfortunatley, you will never get what you got stock due to the bigger tires with increased weight, rolling resistence and drag over the stock street type tires. I get about 15 mpg around town with 410's, V6, auto, and 33x12.50 MT's which is close to what my truck was rated for (16 city, 19 hwy) I too am going to go with 456's mainly for increased pep and better drivability. If all else fails inflate your tires to 36 psi and drive like a senior citizen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,160
|
Also, DEFINATELY DO NOT shift into 4wd until you regear the front to match the rear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Big tars, little bed.
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
My Truck and Specs BRC since 2006www.sharetrails.org TLCA #15854 www.tlca.org SFWDA since 2005 www.sfwda.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Going John Galt
![]() My Rig: '00 Tacoma
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 30,870
|
Quote:
as suggested, get a gps unit and find out exactly what speed you are traveling vs what your speedo reads. this will be your error percentage. stock readings should have been approximately 2180 rpms @70 figuring 31" tires and 4.10 gears. with 33s and 4.56s the rpms should be around 2275 @70 this, of course, will varry depending on the actual tire diameter. this is approximately a 4.2% difference and is about right since you have gone from a 4.10:1 ratio to an 'adjusted' ratio of 4.28:1. (31/4.10 to 33/4.56) you can adjust your speedo/odo and get it pretty darn close by swapping out your speedo drive gear. you should have a 30tooth gear (you'll need to pull it and check) so going to a 31t gear will get you darn close to what your speedo read when stock. http://www.norcalttora.com/~chris/mi...0drive%20gear/ but, you need to figure out your error % first. Gas mileage: this has so many varriables it isn't funny. Tire brand, size, air pressure, wheel width will all be contributing factors as will be your 5" of lift. That much lift creates a lot of wind drag which will effect mileage greatly...part of the price we pay ![]() Tire pressure will play a huge part. what are you running now, air pressure wise? 33x12.50s on 8" rims should be in the 35+ psi range but do a "chalk test" (search) to figure out the optimum pressure to run. HOW you drive plays a huge part as well. Do you stomp on the gas right off the line all the time? What is your average hwy speed? etc, etc. I know guys with lifted dcabs who get 20 or better with 33s and 4.88s but they drive on the conservative side ![]() It will also take your ECU to get used to the different gearing and make adjustments.
__________________
Quote:
Inchworm Rock Walkin' Gear |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 678
|
I have the same MPG now as before the regear, but both are lower than pre-lift. If I had 4.10's before, and I now have 4.56's, I should be back around stock. Considering my lift, bigger tires, heavier wheels, sliders etc, I know I will have a drop from stock MPG no matter what, but shouldn't it improve after regearing?? I have my tires inflated to about 31, and don't drive too hard. 2/3 of my last tank was highway cruizing at 80 MPH, the rest in town. The main problem is still the MPG before regear and after. I looked at the mileage markers on the highway (no GPS available), and after 10 miles, my odo showed about 10.3. So the speedometer and odometer are still pretty close. Adjusting for that difference, I was expecting to be back between 16-18, not stuck at 14 like before the regear. So driving the same, same equipment, and new gears in the rear, no improvement in MPG, or total mileage.
__________________
"In the time it took you to come up with a witty flame, you could have just answered the freaking question!" Ugly 1985 4Runner Last edited by Peanut Butter; 11-30-2005 at 04:29 PM. Reason: Content |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Big tars, little bed.
![]() |
Quote:
I got 19-21 stock with 30's and 31's with 3.91's. I went to 33's for a couple months with the stock 3.91's and got 15 mpg or worse. Once I put in the 4.56's I went back up to 19 mpg at best.
__________________
My Truck and Specs BRC since 2006www.sharetrails.org TLCA #15854 www.tlca.org SFWDA since 2005 www.sfwda.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Going John Galt
![]() My Rig: '00 Tacoma
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 30,870
|
Quote:
IMO, your tire pressure is too low but do the "chalk test" anyway. 5psi can make a 3mpg difference or more. driving at 80mph will suck gas, big time, especially now that your aerodynamics are probably 3x as bad as they were stock. Yes, a 5" lift and running that size tire makes that much difference. your speedo/odo are about 4.2% off so your actual mileage should be about that much better than indicated, ie, 14.6 rather than 14. Those of you with 33x12.50s on 8" rims...what are you running for tire pressure?
__________________
Quote:
Inchworm Rock Walkin' Gear |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,160
|
Your never going to get better mileage driving 80mph in a lifted truck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,281
|
Not if you draft!! Muhahahahha
Lol
__________________
My 2 cents = 1 peso -Jon |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
Also to "Peanut Butter": You should seriously consider swapping out your front diff as soon as possible. Assuming you are an ADD setup, those spider gears are working extra hard right now and were not designed to have that kind of sustained high speed differentiation done to them. Just my $.02
__________________
It’s all fun and games until somebody gets hurt, then it’s hilarious! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Going John Galt
![]() My Rig: '00 Tacoma
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 30,870
|
Quote:
I run 30-32 front and 26 rear with 33x10.50s on 7s I probably have 300# of extra weight on the nose.
__________________
Quote:
Inchworm Rock Walkin' Gear |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 678
|
I am swapping out the diff this weekend, and still getting crap for mileage. It just doesn't seem right!
__________________
"In the time it took you to come up with a witty flame, you could have just answered the freaking question!" Ugly 1985 4Runner |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: No. California
Posts: 134
|
Your in the ball park for mileage. Your V-6 is not going to get better mileage than stock, with a lift, and heavier (rolling mass) tires.
I get 16 mpg corrected, (thanks to Hytenor for the speedo help) combined driving, but mostly city. I run my tires at 40 psi. I understand you can gain a 1 mpg increase, some people report 17 mpg with 4.88 gears under certain driving conditions. I didn't want to run my engine at that much above stock levels. The 4.56 with 33 tires best get you into the engine rpm designed for the truck, but with the rolling mass it robs a little power. The 4x4 double gets 16/18 stock so if I wan't mileage I take the wifes Honda Civic. Later
__________________
2002 Toyota Tacoma Double Cab V-6 TRD 4x4 FRONT SUSPENSION: Tundra TRD 4x2 Coils and Old Man Emu N91S REAR SUSPENSION: Old Man Emu leaf springs and N85 shocks BF Goodrich 255/85-16 Mud Terrains on Stock Wheels, 4.56 Precision Gears |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best miles per tank yet... | WoodTRD | PreRunner Tech | 59 | 05-29-2007 10:17 PM |
| my 2.7L and 3.4L mpg comparison | swimmer | Newbie Tech | 12 | 09-21-2005 09:45 AM |
| what to expect? gear change and mpg. | wvuviv30 | Tires/Wheels | 8 | 09-10-2005 10:31 AM |
| Tire and MPG list??? | CMB1998 | Tires/Wheels | 3 | 05-05-2005 11:24 AM |
| Why does everyone bitch about MPG??? | CMB1998 | Early Tacoma Tech | 44 | 03-31-2005 06:57 PM |