No offense, Mr.T., but please put us a pic when you are actually on the trail, when you get the chance.
NE has caused $1500 in damage each to two 4Runners, the two Tacomas on his website are Revtek spacer lifted not NE. The 05 is a fake lift and he is being investigated by the Federal Trade Commission and NHTSA.liquidman said:I'll soon be posting up some NE suspension mods of my '04 Taco soon.![]()
I've heard a lot of smack in my lifetime. The only way I believe something is to read it for myself. What have you got to back up your quote? Proof? I'm not here to dis on anyone for what they are trying to do. I thought this forum is to help people learn and NOT dis on what they are trying to do/learn.1GR-FE said:NE has caused $1500 in damage each to two 4Runners, the two Tacomas on his website are Revtek spacer lifted not NE. The 05 is a fake lift and he is being investigated by the Federal Trade Commission and NHTSA.
Good luck with that '04...
mistertaco said:When I take her wheeling, which I do quite a bit, I toss on 16" black steel wheels and 35" thornbirds. I will get some pics of that setup posted as time allows. Sliders and a ton of armor are on the way.
MT![]()
thanks BT, yeah the 22's arent worth a damn in the mud or trails. little by little the POS is getting put back together, been a very rough 14,000 miles on that rig, lol. all good though, my experiments have been worth the happiness enjoyed by others. from what i can tell you all arent fans of the t-birds...i had a free hook up on em, but fill me in on what you all think i should snag for the 16's...i am in norcal right now, but the more capable the tire, the better. thx all.BoostedTurd said::xbeer3:
Ok.. I was wondering.. I just read an article about the pros, and cons of 20"+ rims... there were alot more cons, then the 1 or 2 pros... the 16" rims sound much better for wheelin!
Looking nice... dont forgot to re-post pics when you have more done
cheers :xbeer3:
liquidman said:I've heard a lot of smack in my lifetime. The only way I believe something is to read it for myself. What have you got to back up your quote? Proof? I'm not here to dis on anyone for what they are trying to do. I thought this forum is to help people learn and NOT dis on what they are trying to do/learn.
If NE is being investigated - why don't you post up all the info you have for everyone to read. If this is your personal opinion then you should find another forum to post up your complaints/grips on.
Have a NICE day.![]()
I am QUITE sure that none of the companies listed above put out anything REMOTELY comparable to the GARBAGE that Nitrous Enterprises was peddling. See http://www.buyerbeware.ws for examples of this garbage.liquidman said:One more thing. I'm sure that Revtek, Rancho, SkyJacker, etc... didn't make any mistakes either when they built their lift equipment. Nope - no design flaws with any of them I'm sure.
14:57, 14:58, 14:59...kickaha said:I truely believe the information presented here and on the website buyerbeware.ws is of concern to the members of this forum. However, if the moderators would prefer I not post these updates here, just let me know and I'll stop.
Regardless, I will not be involved in any back and forth debating sessions on this forum with Nitrous Enterprises. There is a huge amount of well-documented evidence on buyerbeware.ws. None of the technical details there have been countered anywhere by Nitrous Enterprises. Judge for yourself....
So, for those STILL following this, there is a new article up on the website that takes a detailed look at their choice of materials for the shock re-locators. In particular, it looks at why the stainless re-locators are rusting and the strength of the stainless steel they chose to use. You can find it here:
http://www.buyerbeware.ws/index.php/weblog/more/shock_re_locators_part_3/
What this and all articles on that site are attempting to demonstrate is a pattern of behavior by Nitrous Enterprises showing little if any real engineering research for their products. The results of which are flawed designs and, in turn, flawed products that could have serious safety consequences.
The point of all this being that if the research, design, and manufacturing on the products discussed on that website was so flawed, you might want to insist on actual proof that the product you are thinking of purchasing wasn’t made to the same “standards”.
I've provided actual evidence. Nitrous Enterprises has provided what?
Well two things, one we can't be sure that you're not anthony, not many posts. He is famous for creating multiple accounts to defend himself. Also they don't make mistakes like NE because all of the suspension companies you mentioned do thorough R&D before releasing products. Not just fab something up that looks right, seems to function right, but has no guarantee to last.liquidman said:One more thing. I'm sure that Revtek, Rancho, SkyJacker, etc... didn't make any mistakes either when they built their lift equipment. Nope - no design flaws with any of them I'm sure.